Well, it’s late, but I wouldn’t want to prevent you from getting your monthly fix of I Call ‘Em as I See ‘Em.
Unfortunately, the label given to the last two decades of baseball is the Steroid Era. I say unfortunately because while a number of athletes have confessed or are under heavy suspicion of using performance enhancing drugs, an even larger number of ballplayers (who I firmly believe are clean) have now been linked to steroids, seemingly irreversibly.
I can understand why people started using the phrase “Steroid Era”: Jose Conseco’s book, the outburst of home runs, MLB players testifying before Congress, the list goes on. But lets look at just how fair this label is.
Yes, some players have “juiced.” There just is no escaping it and baseball shouldn’t want to try to sweep it under the rug. But it is only some players. The SI report, when it outed A-Rod, said he was 1 of 104 players to test positive. 104 is a large number, but there are 750 players on MLB rosters at any given time. That means 646 players didn’t test positive. The label of “Steroid Era” makes the average person who doesn’t really follow baseball believe everyone is doing it.
A-Rod’s confession was a big blow for baseball fans everywhere. He was a first ballot Hall of Famer and basically the player of the decade in the “Aughts” (00’s). His admission spread the doubt around further because everyone was looking to him as an example of what a clean player can do.
I still think this is too much attention on only one guy, but so many people used him as an example of a clean player it really hurt baseball. Luckily I’m even more confident that the player of the 90’s, Ken Griffey Jr., is clean than I ever was of A-Rod. But if he should fall (not likely), perhaps I’ll be recanting this post.
But for now, let’s try to stop referring to this as the Steroid Era. Do it for the players who are clean, and don’t need every swing of the bat scrutinized for performance enhancing drugs.